To provide the  right and the opportunity to earn your living instead of give them cake, that’s actually stopping a revolution.

A country should not participate in production of war material.

How to do it in a peaceful way?

jobs, Steve Jobs.

It is great to see, that the need to make money from war and its intended loss of life and living condition exists beyond party lines. Some just cannot get enough and they are willing to ignore their loyalty to their own party.

Like in the movie On the Basis of Sex (2018), which is on the basis of gender, there must be a rift in laws allowing money to be used for the destruction of human life and living conditions. Charles Chaplin in Monsieur Verdoux (1947) already explains the murderer is prosecuted but the warmongers are getting away with mass-murder. When war is not even declared, each death is a war crime. So the law punishes contract killing, the client and the perpetrator are equally guilty. The right to self defense. that is okay. How do we self defense when we send money to other countries so they can kill each other? Are those 92 Billion only used for self-defense of an endangered people? The rift in the law: where do we punish money being paid for murderers and serial killeres and where do we allow money being paid for contractors killing civilians?  Or is it like this : the money is spend for the tools and not their use, like the kitchen knife.

We are humans and we are the only species on this planet earth that kills within their own specie’s boundaries. 

For the Pentagon : Run a query to find laws that permit the spending of money regardless the loss of life, sacrifice (1), and a query to find laws that punish the spending of money in regards of loss of life (2).

Where do we draw the line in morals:  it was a crime what happened in WWII but it is okay to send money so people can kill each other?

to be defensive, (3).

to be offensive, (4).

query, (10).

quarry, (11).

—

quote Moreover, a direct signalling function was proposed for selenoprotein P through interaction with post-synaptic apoliprotein E receptors 2 (ApoER2). end quote.

Selenskyj, (5).

selen, (6).

sky, (7).

j, (8).

Alexander, (9).

—

“sacrifice”, the justification of loss of human life and infrastructure in the law in contradiction of punishing the loss of human life and infrastructure as a crime.

—-

why do we have war?

we want to win.

we never give up.

Pixels, (2015).

play sports instead.

—

T4

—

Disclaimer.