The Codified Constitution of Lebanon.

Posted on by Eva Lewinter

Yes, Lebanon has a codified constitution, which was adopted on May 23, 1926. While it establishes the framework for a parliamentary democratic republic, its functioning is deeply shaped by unwritten traditions and power-sharing agreements.

No, the Constitution of Lebanon does not support terrorism. The constitution is rooted in democratic principles, establishing Lebanon as a parliamentary republic based on respect for public liberties, equal rights for all citizens, and the separation of powers.

Hezbollah (also spelled Hizballah) is an Iran-backed, heavily armed political party and militant group based in Lebanon. It is designated as a terrorist organization by more than 60 countries and organizations globally, including the United States, the European Union, the Arab League, and the Gulf Cooperation Council.

Lebanon does not designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization. Because it functions as a major Shi’ite political party, militant group, and social service provider in the country, it holds parliamentary and ministerial representation.

Whether Hezbollah is violating the Lebanese Constitution is a subject of intense legal and political dispute, with Lebanese officials, constitutional scholars, and Hezbollah itself offering fundamentally conflicting interpretations.

Disclaimer.

The Codified Constitution of Norway.

Posted on by Eva Lewinter

Norway has a codified constitution. Drafted in 1814, it is the second-oldest written, codified national constitution still in active use today.

Does the name Norway manifest as neither nor.

“neither… nor way” (both doesn’t apply)

neither this nor way.

weder dies noch der Weg.

ni ceci ni la manière.

né questo né il modo.

there is a way, the NOR way.

“NOR” most commonly refers to the grammatical conjunction meaning “and not.”

NOR stands for “Not overreacting”.

Nonordinary Reality.

Net Operating Result.

No Official Response.

Notice Of Readiness.

Norbert.

normal.

There is a unknown process of mutual exclusion, like a divide and conquer, that is not normal or uncontrollable.

Disclaimer.

The Codified Constitution of Denmark.

Posted on by Eva Lewinter

Denmark has a codified constitution known as the Constitutional Act of the Realm of Denmark (Danish: Grundloven). First adopted in 1849 and last extensively amended in 1953, it is the supreme law of the country and outlines the structure of the Danish government, citizen rights, and the separation of powers.

Yes, citizens of Greenland are Danish citizens. Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, and its residents hold Danish passports. Because of this, they are also citizens of the European Union, although Greenland itself is not part of the EU.

While they share Danish nationality, Greenland maintains a distinct national identity and high degree of self-government through its own parliament, the Inatsisartut.

How can an Inuit be part of the EU whole Greenland is not, the EU cannot just confiscate/kidnap a people! The jurisdiction is defined by the country and not by the citizenship. Example : if I am an US citizen traveling in Germany I am under German jurisdiction unless I go to a American consulate or embassy in Germany.

Denmark has no embassies or consulate in Greenland and Greeland doesn’t have a embassy or consulate in Denmark.

An Inuit living in Greenland is a member of the EU evenso Greenland is not.

No, Greenland did not vote in the last European Union (EU) election.

This is jurisdictional bullshit that violates conceptional principles.

What home rule is in place for Greenland?

How does the term “home rule” differentiate between political self-administration and the privacy of one’s home?

Why is the failiure to return a child in Denmark into the custody of a parent living outside Denmark not kidnapping? Why does Denmark not recognize/reconcile custody regulations with other European and non European countries?

How could Denmark force Greenland’s children to grow up in Denmark and how does today’s law prevent this?

How could Denmark impose contraceptived on Greenland women without their knowledge and how does today’s law prevent this?

Why doesn’t Denmark recognize the violation of custody regulations by its citizens as kidnapping? Why does Denmark accuse foreigners of kidnapping when they try to enforce existing custody rulings?

Is Denmark violating the constituonal value of equality and is this violation racist in case of the following combinations:

(a) Danish citizenship and Danish ethnicity

(b) Danish citizenship and non-Danish ethnicity

(c) Non-Danish citizenship and Danish ethnicity (50% or more)

(d) Non-Danish citizenship and non-Danish ethnicity (less than 50%).

Disclaimer.