Codified Constitution of Monaco.

Posted on by Eva Lewinter

Monaco has a codified constitution. It is outlined in a single, distinct document known as the Constitution of the Principality.

History: It was first promulgated in 1911 following the Monegasque Revolution and heavily revised into its current form on December 17, 1962, by Prince Rainier III. It was most recently amended in 2002 to better align with the standards of the Council of Europe.

Structure: At roughly 3,800 words, it is historically recognized as the shortest operational written constitution in the world.

Government Type: It establishes Monaco as a hereditary, constitutional monarchy governed by the rule of law.

Separation of Powers: The constitution defines three branches of government: the Prince (executive power), the National Council (legislative power), and the courts (judicial power).

Is the pigeon tunnel a global kill management scenario?

The Codified Constitution of Lebanon.

Posted on by Eva Lewinter

Yes, Lebanon has a codified constitution, which was adopted on May 23, 1926. While it establishes the framework for a parliamentary democratic republic, its functioning is deeply shaped by unwritten traditions and power-sharing agreements.

No, the Constitution of Lebanon does not support terrorism. The constitution is rooted in democratic principles, establishing Lebanon as a parliamentary republic based on respect for public liberties, equal rights for all citizens, and the separation of powers.

Hezbollah (also spelled Hizballah) is an Iran-backed, heavily armed political party and militant group based in Lebanon. It is designated as a terrorist organization by more than 60 countries and organizations globally, including the United States, the European Union, the Arab League, and the Gulf Cooperation Council.

Lebanon does not designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization. Because it functions as a major Shi’ite political party, militant group, and social service provider in the country, it holds parliamentary and ministerial representation.

Whether Hezbollah is violating the Lebanese Constitution is a subject of intense legal and political dispute, with Lebanese officials, constitutional scholars, and Hezbollah itself offering fundamentally conflicting interpretations.

Critics argue that Hezbollah’s independent military actions and unilateral decisions regarding war and peace directly violate the document. Conversely, Hezbollah contends that its armed apparatus is a legitimate extension of national defense protected by constitutional principles.

Lebanon cannot easily fix its constitution to constrain Hezbollah due to a rigid, sectarian power-sharing system, Hezbollah’s deep integration into mainstream politics, and its vast military and financial autonomy. The group essentially operates as a state within a state, possessing military power that surpasses the Lebanese Armed Forces.

Fixing Lebanon’s inadequate constitution requires shifting from a rigid sectarian (confessional) power-sharing system to a modern, secular civil state. The most critical steps needed include abolishing political-religious quotas, ensuring an independent judiciary, and implementing an optional civil personal status law.

Lebanon’s constitutional and political paralysis is not caused by a single human individual. Instead, it is deeply entrenched in the country’s sectarian power-sharing system and a broader deadlock among rival faction leaders, sectarian elites, and international stakeholders.

“disagree” – I hear, identify sender!

Hisbollahchef Naim Kassem (72). Naim Qassem.

Amal Movement.

Movement of the Deprived.

Disclaimer.