Joachim-Friedrich Martin Josef Merz, how are you?
passive agression (1) leads to
agression (2).
do nothing, European interpretation, (3).
do nothing, Chinese interpretation, (4).
in case of a vicious circle, the parliaments have the task to solve the problem, and they are doing it, (5). They are not doing it, (6), or they are not capable of doing it (7), the APO terrorist management process ,(8), is abolishing or disestablishing the parliamentarian functions, (9).
The parliamentarian functions are abolishing because social media represents the people: better (10) or worse (11), equally (12), more freely (13), less freely (14), more differentiated (15), less differentiated (16), with greater impact (17), with less impact (18)… what else?
fuck, I hear virtually, identify sender!
8, okay.
Frequenzillusion.
Urteilsfehler.
Kognitive Verzerrungen beginnen lange bevor wir bewusst über eine Sache nachdenken.
cognitive bias.
biais cognitif.
kognitiv skjevhet.
bias cognitivo.
The “Linda Problem” illustrates the representativeness heuristic and corresponding bias. Participants were given a description of “Linda” that suggests Linda might well be a feminist (e.g., she is said to be concerned about discrimination and social justice issues). They were then asked whether they thought Linda was more likely to be (a) a “bank teller” or (b) a “bank teller and active in the feminist movement.” A majority chose answer (b). Independent of the information given about Linda, though, the more restrictive answer (b) is under any circumstance statistically less likely than answer (a). This is an example of the conjunction fallacy: respondents chose (b) because it seemed more “representative” or typical of persons who might fit the description of Linda.[15] The representativeness heuristic may lead to errors such as activating stereotypes and inaccurate judgments of others.
Haselton MG, Nettle D, Andrews PW (2005). “The evolution of cognitive bias” (PDF). In Buss DM (ed.). Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 724–746.
the Linda problem as explained in the Wikipedia article based on Haselton’s article is an excellent example of pseudo-science. Pseudo-science because of the fact that a false test arrangement leads to false conclusions, therefore the most important question is : What is the the name of the test? There has to be a rule that a rest must have a name. Any test performed in any contexts must be identifiable by it’s name and responsible author(s).
My father, Walter Pich, already noticed that the so called multiple choice questions are restricting the intellectual process. Many surveys or multiple choice questionnaire are simply wrong because they force the test person in a corset of prethought answers, which tell more about the tester than the test person.
Now you know why alternative became a political power. With or without a political party, stupidity will always created a task for constant improvement.
focus (19) or attention(20).
at tension (21).
at tention, (22).
the psychology test in Gymnasium am Rotenbühl, tester was an American psychology student, (23), the questions were confusing and the answers therefore random not conscious, the tester made the mistake to interpret all answers as a conscious decision, there was no don’t understand, don’t know option, as far as I remember.
Angela Dorothea Merkel, how are you?
I mention in a discussion Twitter and X as one of all social media who regulate editorial responsibility through algorithm. My discussion partner starts to defend X Social media because my mentioning him created a virtual connectivity. My discussion partner is not consciously aware that her background is now the virtual presence of Elon Musk.
The discussion ends in an unproductive way.
It seems to be an collapse point when I say ” This is wrong”. As already observed in other social environments.
It is an interesting observation, that two social partners have TBI, as had one programmer who was working for me. I was surprised at the time that an individual with TBI could perform as an SAP programmer.
TBI je zkratka pro traumatické poranění mozku (anglicky Traumatic Brain Injury).
another call to Exner is triggering a call back from number +4980033024242.
Exner doesn’t reply for 4 weeks now.
Exner replied per SMS through one of his mobile phone numbers. This is great news. That’s how it should be, thank you so much!
Disclaimer.
125811's Blog 