Ops. Manager.

CSCO and ACS Support.

Dear Mr. J.,



Thanks for your reply from April 17th, 2024.

Thanks for sending the return vouchers.

I understand this case is under review and I will wait until I hear further statements from the IRS.

However, I would like to take the opportunity to inform you about the following: I already was trying to make payments to the IRS when living in Germany for my regular income tax. The payments were only possible by credit card over the Internet. This was possible because the payments were less than $5,000.- and because I did have a credit card in Germany at the time.

Financial institutions in Europe are not able to cut a check in US dollars nor are they able to transfer or wire-transfer any amount to the IRS. Financial Institutions in Europe require an IBAN number. Even Western Union in Germany refused to cut a check in US dollar, all they can do is Euro.

One question here is if I owe any tax for my inheritance in Germany, the other question is: how can the United States of America tax administration charge late fees, if they are not able to provide money transfer instructions in German that actually will be accepted by Financial Institutions in Germany.

It sounds like a joke to me, to read in the news, that millions and billions of our taxpayer money are pumped into war regions, when we the taxpayers are taxed falsely and if not, do not have a valid payment method to pay our tax obligations.



If you conclude that I indeed owe taxes for my inheritance in Germany, please add instructions on how to pay them in Germany and in a format that is acceptable for financial institutions in Germany. Should those instructions not exist or not be made available to me, I will refuse any interest payments. It is not my responsibility as a taxpayer to make sure that payment methods exist.

As a consultant, I will charge all travel expenses and consulting fees with an hour’s rate of $300.





Sincerely,

Eva

Disclaimer.

David Wright LeWinter, how are you?

Ritalin damaged.

MK-Ultra danaged.

Elon Musk : human intelligence will be 1% when AI takes over? Sounds to me like London will be suffocating in horse shit until 1978. Or how can he talk about something he obviously doesn’t have as he proves by a statement like this? It also proves you can write the greatest bullshit on the Internet when you are an automated outlet of the industrial military complex, a Virus (1999) product. Your chip is obviously working for which machine? The mankind grinder? Get your own dirt!

At the  IBM laboratory library in Germany, there was a book about geniuses, it featured Adolf Hitler as one.

Christine Madeleine Odette Lagarde, how are you?

Kamala Devi Harris, how are you?

Disclaimer.

Eva M Haines-Lewinter

Indianapolis


                                                                                                                Thursday, May 9, 2024



IRS


Ms. M. F.


Austin, TX 73301-0025




–          Your reference 0544xxx








Dear Ms. F. ,





I received your letter dated April 16th, 2024, thank you!





You claim “we reviewed your information” and came to the conclusion “no action is necessary on your account”.





I understand you are only doing your work to the best of your knowledge.


Please confirm in detail that you understand the following:


1.)    The tax charge of $910,118.29 is based on an inheritance “Rosemarie Meyer-Stoll” in the country of Germany.


2.)    Under the jurisdiction of Germany, the inheritance value was estimated and taxed at 30% already according to German law. The responsible entities in Germany are:


a.       Thomas Huth, attorney, Klosterstrasse 11, 61462 Königstein Taunus, Germany


b.       Dr. Stefan Exner, executor, Albrechtstr. 12, 06844 Dessau-Rosslau, Germany


c.       Amtsgericht Königstein, Taunus, Gerichtstr. 2, 61462 Königstein Taunus, Germany


d.       Finanzamt Fulda, Gerberstr. 19, 36037 Fulda, Germany


e.       Waltraud Kuehn, attorney, Frankfurter Str. 6, 61462 Königstein Taunus, Germany


f.        Consulate General of the United States of America, Giessener Str. 30, 60435 Frankfurt Main, Germany


3.)    All taxes and fees have been paid already for this inheritance under the jurisdiction of Germany.


4.)    Please explain under the double taxation agreement between the United States of America, why the United States of America claims jurisdiction over the taxation of this inheritance. The assumption is that either one or (exclusive or) the other country is allowed to tax, but not both.


a.       Should Germany have precedence over the jurisdiction of this taxation, any additional taxation from the United States of America would be illegal.


b.       Should the United States of America have precedence over the jurisdiction of this taxation, why did the United States of America fail to claim jurisdiction in regards to the facilitating entities in Germany, the individuals mentioned in 2.) of this letter?


c.       How does the United States of America communicate in the year 2024, that it had jurisdiction in the year 2017, to make Germany reverse its mistake to claim jurisdiction?


5.)    Should it be legal to tax an inheritance from Germany at 30% in Germany and to an additional 25% in the United States of America, please explain the following:


a.       The jurisdiction to estimate the value is under the responsibility of Germany.


b.       The jurisdiction to estimate the value is under the responsibility of the United States of America.


c.       Both countries make their own estimates to charge their tax.


d.       Should the due date timing of the United States have preference and jurisdiction in Germany, why weren’t the entities in 2.) not told so? I told them but they didn’t comply.


e.       Should the due date timing of Germany have preference and jurisdiction in the United States of America, why is the United States of America not able to follow that process? In fact, the final estimated value of the inheritance in Germany was determined in the year 2021, so how can the United States request this information with a due date 12/31/2017?



The process described here, a double jurisdiction over a period of time with different evaluation schemes at two opposing points in time, reminds me of the “cum-ex” fraud scenario.



Please answer the questions above, since you haven’t convinced me yet, that this isn’t a fraud scheme.





My understanding is that double taxation is indeed fraud. Furthermore, the representation of an individual as a taxpayer in two countries for the same tax object at the same time is fraud.


This case is documented.


Sincerely,


Eva.

Disclaimer.

Nancy Faeser, how are you?

Avril Danica Haines, how are you?

MAVIG.

Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., how are you?

Janet Louise Yellen, how are you?

Benjamin Netanyahu, how are you?

Gina Haspel, how are you?

Disclaimer.