Dream : I was at a doctor’s office and I had to pay 200 dollars, I went to the bank and paid the doctor, he said those are not 200 dollars those are 2 million dollars and I saw a 2 million dollar bill. I went back to the bank to fix the mistake but for whatever reason some of the money was spent and I was indebted. I was trying so hard that when I woke up I still tried to fix this. Then I realized it was just a bad dream. So far the dream.
Inception, 2010.
Dr. Quisno is virtual noticable, how are you?
Donald John Trump is virtually noticeable, how are you?
Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei is virtually noticeable, how are you?
Anthony Guglielmi, good job!
Nasire B. thought he was Jesus, the alcoholic Jesus joke. Who Director-General is a Jesus.
Ingrid Daniela Vera Figueroa
Villarica
Alexander Graham Bell Schule
Vulkans Llaima
Héctor Tillería, Regionaldirektor der Nationalen Forstbehörde (CONAF).
unregistered.
not roped in.
to be on the safe side.
not to be on the safe side.
page 193:
Walter Arensberg, (1878-1954).
Alfred Kreymborg, (1883-1966).
Carl Sandburg, (1878-2967).
Louis Untermeyer, (1885-1977).
Eunice Tietjens, (1884-1944).
Clara Shanafelt, (1888-1957).
James Oppenheimer, (1882-1932).
Maxwell Bodenheimer, (1982-1954).
Richard Glaenzer, (1876-1937).
Scharmel Iris, (1889-1967).
Conrad Aiken, (1889-1973).
senseless name dropping.
Iris, 2001, Iris Murdoch.
Iris Murdoch, (1919–1999).
Dame Jean Iris Murdoch.
Hornbuckle, Calley A. (2006), Exploring Aesthetic Perception of the Real in Iris Murdoch’S the Black Prince, Analecta Husserliana, vol. 92, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 221–233, doi:10.1007/1-4020-3744-9_16, ISBN 1-4020-3743-0, retrieved 21 May 2024
A series of Iris Murdoch walks in London Archived 15 December 2006 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 24 February 2010.
The book “This Side of Paradise” by F. Scott Fitzgerald is a very good candidate, not only for a movie, but for artificial intelligence benchmark testing. The question would be : what is the result, moral, ethic, message of this book, the output limited to one page or a defined number of words.
Now here is the challenge : a deep search and resolving all references will either hold or it won’t hold, meaning the artificial intelligence program will break because of overload or it won’t.
In computer science we talk about np-complete or not, the program had a limit how long it is calculating or uses a simulation for practical reasons of computability. For mathematical functions this is defined by approximations, proximity function, e. h. for sinus and cosinus (Näherungsfunktionen).
But this is a piece of literature with excessive names dropping, the names not being a character or an extra. Meaning whatever conclusion algorithm your artificial intelligence is using it needs to summarize the results found in a deep search of all its references and come up with a final conclusion.
So ask your artificial intelligence the question : what is the message of this book.
If the anser is “41” then you are in the wrong book. 😂🤣😂🤣
So the result of such a search is the summarization of some critic, that was accessible to the artificial intelligence program, it doesn’t think for itself it just copies a human response to the question. The student copies from another student. This is not intelligence, this is plagiarism. Anonymization of Website cookies, plagiarism fed as input to so called artificial intelligence.
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, how are you? “yesus”.
Yes, each time I write how are you there is a virtual connectivity. What is the purpose, the reason, the initiator of this connectivity, it doesn’t make any sense to me and it is abusive. This is what this blog is about.
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, how are you?
Rachel Meghan Markle-Windsor.
Civil rights for royalty.
Many royal families do not have civil rights, evenso the citizens of the country their royalty is based on do have civil rights. E. g. the freedom of speech for the British Royal family is restricted, the Prime Minister is talking politics.
So what do we have here : Harry and Meghan are members of the British Royal Family. Does Meghan still have her American passport, is she still a American citizen? I assume yes, she is. From an US point of view her husband is entitled to a green card because he is married to an American. Their are either an American couple or a British couple, whatever jurisdiction is applied. As members of the British Royal Family they are subjects of that jurisdiction and of those rules. If they claim US jurisdiction it might conflict with British jurisdiction, e. g. the freedom of speech about politics.
HRH William, Prince of Wales, William Arthur Philip Louis Windsor, how are you?
colonizer.
Kolonisator.
colonial power.
Kolonialmacht.
colony.
Kolonie.
Which “home rules” do apply? In my case the home rules of Rebecca Parish in the house that belongs to her father, that is our martial home apply? Why is that the case? She doesn’t have manners? She has psychological issues, I have psychological issues, my husband has psychical issues? Who is the puppet master of this situation? The librarian function? Shall I yell at them in front of the grandkids, you guys don’t have manners? I rather leave and throw this out as a case study, because there is a bigger picture here : individuals are puppetmastered into a routine that they no longer question! Sarah Kessler is now virtual noticeable, why? Who is doing this bullshit virtual connectivity?
Megan, Dutchess of Sussex, how are you? What is the purpose of this connectivity, how can I help you?
UK: The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and National Crime Agency (NCA) – the internet isn’t safe for children? it isn’t safe for seniors and adults neither. Wifi isn’t safe either.
Andrew Albert Christian Edward Mountbatten-Windsor, how are you?
Commonwealth realms.
real MS.
unreal MS.
house rules : do you have to take your shoes off? This is a stereotype overmotivated question in the current context, identify sender.
taking the shoes off as:
a cultural habit,
airport security check,
practical reasons dirty shoes yes, stinky feet no.
Angela Dorothea Merkel is virtually noticeable, how are you? So you are playing communication champion with Donald John Trump, hijacking the time-all activity functions process again, like you did before when you were still in office. This doesn’t help, you are only repeating historic mistakes.
Like Hegseth is hijacking time all activity functions to put in a combat mode context, that is not properly synchronized with the romantic mode context.
What are we talking about? False animation. based on false conclusions.
Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei, how are you?
supreme leader of Iran.
highest: in regards to what? is he on mount everest? highest moral, highest ethics, highest bank account, ask your artificial intelligence that is animating you, the highest decision maker for the people of Iran.
anal signal. identify sender.
the supreme court in the United States, the highest decision maker for the judiciary of the people of the United States.
the highest decision maker for the executive branch of the United States.
hijacking a meeting, Ronda the manager from the Ciba Vision project. “Ciba Vision”. I will keep you responsible for the bullshit that happened to me and my daughter during this project and the recurrence of that problem 20 years later.
Entacapone.
Comtan.
“Novartis to cut almost 2,000 US jobs this year”, The Jakarta Post, Associated Press, jakartapost.com, 13 January 2012, archived from the original on 25 May 2013, retrieved 2012-01-15
baby I virtually hear, identify sender.
Marco Antonio Rubio is now virtually noticeable, does he wear contract lenses? Kick him out of the meeting!
Kill Command, 2016, contact lenses use is coming up.
Wu YC (2006). “New Research and Development on the Formosan Annonaceous Plants”. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. 33: 957–1023. doi:10.1016/S1572-5995(06)80044-X. ISBN 978-0-444-52717-2.
Disclaimer.
125811's Blog 